As we have read through the Gospels, we see each author write about the Resurrection of Jesus. These range from Mark’s rather abbreviated account to the longer account we have here, and John will have even more about the post-resurrection appearances of Jesus. The Resurrection is a critical fact for Christianity, for without it we would have no way to know that Jesus’ death was anything more than the ending of human life that occurs for all people. It is vital to the proclamation of the gospel that Jesus is truly alive.
The gospel writers are honest enough to write the truth about the reaction of Jesus’ followers to the news of His resurrection. There was not an immediate and rapid embrace of the truth that Jesus was alive. Here in Luke’s gospel he recounts several post-resurrection accounts, with followers witnessing the empty tomb or Jesus Himself. In each of these, there is a degree of hesitancy or even of skepticism that what they were seeing was real.
This phenomenon, and a possible reason for it, is seen in the extended account of Jesus on the road to Emmaus. Two members of Jesus’ extended circle of disciple were headed home from Jerusalem, about seven miles from Emmaus. The bane of only one, Cleopas, is given, which may indicate he was known to Luke and perhaps well-known in the early church. They were discussing the events that had recently happened, including the death of Jesus and the rumors of His resurrection. Jesus joined them as a fellow-traveler, though the two did not recognize Him, perhaps through divine intervention.
Jesus asked them what they were discussing. This question caused them to come to a stop, shocked that someone from the area of Jerusalem could be ignorant of the events that had taken place in that city. In recounting these events, Cleopas indicated that the two travelers had expected Jesus to be the One who would redeem Israel. Their messianic expectations had been dashed by Jesus’ crucifixion, but now they were puzzled by the news brought by the women that the tomb was empty.
Jesus rebuked the two for their ignorance of the prophecies of the Old Testament concerning the Messiah. He then proceeded to open the Scriptures and explain all that had been written about Him. (This is a lesson many scholars wish one of the men had written down!) When the encouraged Jesus to stay with them, He agreed to eat with them. As He broke the bread and blessed it, their eyes were opened, and they recognized Jesus. Even as He vanished from their sight, they admitted that His teaching had been “burning within them” and, now believing that Jesus was alive, they rushed back to Jerusalem to report that they had seen Jesus.
Accounts such as this remind us that the Resurrection was not easily understood or accepted by Jesus’ early followers. It took some convincing for them to accept that He was alive. Even when He appeared physically before them, His disciples had trouble accepting the truth of His resurrection. Perhaps their disappointment at His death, or their dashed messianic hopes, made them hesitant to believe, as with the two from Emmaus. This hesitancy actually serves to add to our confidence in the gospel accounts, which do not hide the struggles of Jesus’ followers to accept His resurrection. We have accounts that do not sugar-coat the story or make the early Christians appear with super faith, so we can trust that what they are telling us is true.